We now discuss some important results that will often be used.
Subsection3.3.1Sequences in closed intervals
The next theorem is one of the reasons why an interval \([a,b]\) is called “closed” (if a sequence in in \([a,b]\text{,}\) its limit cannot “get out” of \([a,b]\)).
Theorem3.3.1.
Let \(a\lt b\text{.}\) Suppose \(c_n\in [a,b]\) for all \(n\text{,}\) and \(\displaystyle \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}c_n=c\text{.}\) Then \(c\in [a,b]\text{.}\)
Proceed by contradiction and assume for example that \(c\gt b\text{.}\) Then consider \(\epsilon=(c-b)/2\text{.}\)
Subsection3.3.2The squeeze theorem
This theorem is so popular that has its own name.
Theorem3.3.2.The squeeze theorem.
Suppose \((a_n)\text{,}\)\((b_n)\) are sequences, both converging to the same limit \(L\text{.}\) If \((c_n)\) is a sequence such that \(a_n\leq c_n\leq b_n\) for all \(n\text{,}\) then \((c_n)\) converges to \(L\text{.}\)
The name of the theorem should be clear: if the two sequences \((a_n),(b_n)\) both approach the same value \(L\) and \((c_n)\) is “squeezed” between them, then \((c_n)\) will also approach \(L\text{.}\) See the figure below,
Figure3.3.3.The squeeze theorem for sequences \(a_n\leq c_n \leq b_n\)
If \(n_0\) “works” for both \((a_n)\) and \((b_n)\text{,}\) show that it also “works” for \((c_n)\text{.}\)
The next example is probably the simplest application of the squeeze theorem, and it is often used in many problems involving the sine and cosine functions. While we have not yet defined what \(\sin\) and \(\cos\) are in this course, we will rely on previous knowledge of these functions from the Precalculus or Calculus courses. In particular, we will use the fact that the range of \(\sin x\) and \(\cos x\) is \([-1,1]\text{.}\)
Example3.3.4.
Let \(\displaystyle a_n=\frac{\sin n}{n}\text{.}\) Since \(-1\leq \sin n\leq 1\text{,}\) we have \(|\sin n|\leq 1\text{,}\) and so
Since the constant sequence \(0\) and the sequence \(1/n\) both converge to \(0\text{,}\) we conclude from the squeeze theorem that \(\displaystyle \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} a_n=0\text{.}\)
Consider the case that \((a_n)\) is increasing. Since the set \(\{a_n: n\in {\mathbb N}\}\) is bounded, its supremum \(a\) exists. Prove that \(a\) is the limit by considering \(a-\epsilon\text{,}\) and using Remark 2.2.8.
Proof Assume \((a_n)\) increasing. Given \(\epsilon \gt 0\text{,}\)\(a-\epsilon\) cannot be an upper bound for the sequence, so there must be some \(n_0\in {\mathbb N}\) such that \(a_{n_0}\gt a-\epsilon\text{.}\) If \(n\geq n_0\text{,}\) since \((a_n)\) is increasing, and \(s\) is an upper bound, we find \(a-\epsilon\lt a_{n_0} \leq a_n \leq a\lt a+\epsilon\text{,}\) that is, \(|a_n-a|\lt \epsilon .\)
We have now discussed three different properties sequences can have: they can be bounded, they can be monotone, and they can be convergent. In order to really understand the concepts and their relationships, it is useful to bear in mind simple examples of sequences that satisfy each property, and also of the relationships between the properties. Theorem 3.2.5 says “Convergent implies Bounded” and Theorem 3.3.5 says “Bounded and Monotone implies Convergent”. Are there any other relationships? See the exercises.